ITAP 7 Production & Outcomes’ influences & reactions
Principle 1 Interpretation
The
fairytale Beauty and the Beast is an old fable that has a surprising long
history, its first incarnation is believed to have been The Golden Ass from the
second century, yep that will make it quite old then. The tale has changed
dramatically over years but the central premise appears to be overcoming
difficulties and or expectations of a relationship, so that the couple can live
harmoniously together as man and wife, which is quite an adult theme.
The
imagery I have found are from 1875 and 1935 and interestingly from a male and
female illustrator, which adds a further dynamic to the interpretation. Anne Anderson’s
image is quite intimate with the black background emphasises the scene it’s
self. The beast, which utterly bestial, with grey scales, talons, razor sharp
teeth, and huge pointed ears and nose, sits before the beauty fawning naked
accept for a stout collar, which could be a metaphor that he can be tamed or a
reference to a dog of war.
Beauty
is depicted as young, elegant, and vulnerable, she sits flushed, pensive, and
looks ready to escape the sly looking beast in a moment should the need arise.
The scene alludes to grandeur through one ornate chair and a large bowl of
fruit, thereby implying that material wealth is of less consequence in the
tail.
I
have found conflicting dates for the image but it is most likely to be 1935, after
the First World War and during the depression. This could be the motivation for
the ugliness of the beast, reflecting the worst of mans nature. The scene has a
sexual tension that is provoked by beauty wearing a night gown, the dark, and
the leering look from the beast. To me, it is a reflection of the true nature
of the story of the preciousness of feminine virtue that has to overcome the
true nature of man before the union of marriage.
Walter
Cranes Illustration was published in 1875 and is loaded references from the
Victorian period through the extensive furniture, tea service, and costumes
that the beauty and the beast wear. It is spectacularly detailed even including
ebony and ivory incrusted footstool that beauty is using. Anatomically the
beast a human stature and countenance that is very relaxed, almost pompous
looking, while he has cloven hooves sporting the most luxurious boots, and the
head of a boar. Beauty seems well at ease, leaning forward towards the beast,
and appears to be enjoying the civility of her surroundings and company. Her
illustration is of a classical Greek styled beauty, which looks more womanly in
all her finery than Anderson ’s
beauty.
Crane’s
work is bright and colourful and seems to reflect a scene of utter normality
for the very affluent, which represents an imperialistic tone from the time,
but devoid of emotion, save pomposity. Anderson ’s
illustration is almost the reverse, dark with minimal detail and loaded with
emotion. This could be a reflection of trauma of the First World War, the austerity
of the 1930’s, and the serious nature of marrying well, as shown from a woman’s
perspective.
Jeez, and I thought it was a kids story.
No comments:
Post a Comment